Space, astronomy, rockets and the physics of it all.
Saturday, October 24, 2026 · UTC
Launches & Rockets

What it would take to nuke a 'city-killer' asteroid, according to 59 days on a supercomputer

Lawrence Livermore scientists simulated a 1-megaton blast beside a Bennu-shaped rock. Two of three runs broke it apart; what happens next is still a mystery.

Science and Earth
Share on X
Stands on 14 placed sources from 4 publishers.
LIVERMORE, USA, Oct. 14, 2026 - What if a city-killer asteroid were found heading for Earth with little time to spare? Scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have tested one answer on a computer: a nuclear blast.[1] The team, led by Isaiah Santistevan,[2] published the work in The Planetary Science Journal.[3] Their virtual target was a 160-metre asteroid,[4] about 525 feet across and shaped like the real asteroid Bennu, with a one-megaton weapon detonated nearby.[5] The blast's X-rays heat the rock's surface and drive fractures rather than shock waves;[6] as surface material blasts off, it can push the asteroid off course and crack it apart.[7] Two of the three scenarios showed strong signs of the asteroid breaking up.[8] With the bomb 10 metres away, 98.2 percent of the rock was damaged,[9] and in one run 97 percent of the material flew off faster than the asteroid's own escape velocity.[10] Surprisingly, moving the bomb farther away caused more widespread damage.[11] Getting there took patience: a single 145-millisecond simulation ran for 59 days on 1,680 processors.[12] The runs follow only the first instants after the blast,[13] so nobody yet knows whether the pieces would scatter safely or pull back together.[14] Space Nugget. Escape velocity is the speed something needs to break free of a body's gravity for good. For a small asteroid it can be slower than a brisk walk, which is why even a modest push can send rubble drifting away, and why scientists worry that slow fragments might fall back and gather into a new rubble pile.
Proof14 sources · 4 publishers · signed
What this stands on
  1. Scientists tested nuking a city killer asteroid via computer simulation. · vice.com
  2. Isaiah Santistevan led the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory team. · vice.com
  3. The research was published in The Planetary Science Journal. · vice.com
  4. Simulations tested a 1-megaton nuclear blast near a 160-meter asteroid. · thebrighterside.news
  5. Simulations used a one-megaton nuclear weapon near a 525-foot asteroid modeled after Bennu. · vice.com
  6. Blast X-rays heat asteroid surface to drive fractures, not shock waves. · thebrighterside.news
  7. Surface material ejection may change asteroid trajectory and fracture the rock. · vice.com
  8. Two of three tested simulation scenarios showed strong asteroid disruption signs. · newswise.com
  9. At 10-meter detonation distance, 98.2 percent of asteroid material was damaged. · vice.com
  10. In one simulation, 97% of asteroid material moved faster than escape velocity. · thebrighterside.news
  11. Moving the bomb further away caused more widespread asteroid damage. · vice.com
  12. One 145 millisecond simulation took 59 days to run on 1680 computer processors. · sciencealert.com
  13. Simulations only ran for fractions of a second. · thebrighterside.news
  14. Researchers cannot confirm if fragments will disperse safely or regroup. · thebrighterside.news
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.