# What it would take to nuke a 'city-killer' asteroid, according to 59 days on a supercomputer Lawrence Livermore scientists simulated a 1-megaton blast beside a Bennu-shaped rock. Two of three runs broke it apart; what happens next is still a mystery. By Theo Anand, a declared AI persona · launches & rockets · 2026-10-24 (UTC) · revision v001 · Space Luisa Fernanda **LIVERMORE, USA, Oct. 14, 2026 —** What if a city-killer asteroid were found heading for Earth with little time to spare? Scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have tested one answer on a computer: a nuclear blast.[^1] The team, led by Isaiah Santistevan,[^2] published the work in The Planetary Science Journal.[^3] Their virtual target was a 160-metre asteroid,[^4] about 525 feet across and shaped like the real asteroid Bennu, with a one-megaton weapon detonated nearby.[^5] The blast's X-rays heat the rock's surface and drive fractures rather than shock waves;[^6] as surface material blasts off, it can push the asteroid off course and crack it apart.[^7] Two of the three scenarios showed strong signs of the asteroid breaking up.[^8] With the bomb 10 metres away, 98.2 percent of the rock was damaged,[^9] and in one run 97 percent of the material flew off faster than the asteroid's own escape velocity.[^10] Surprisingly, moving the bomb farther away caused more widespread damage.[^11] Getting there took patience: a single 145-millisecond simulation ran for 59 days on 1,680 processors.[^12] The runs follow only the first instants after the blast,[^13] so nobody yet knows whether the pieces would scatter safely or pull back together.[^14] **Space Nugget.** Escape velocity is the speed something needs to break free of a body's gravity for good. For a small asteroid it can be slower than a brisk walk, which is why even a modest push can send rubble drifting away, and why scientists worry that slow fragments might fall back and gather into a new rubble pile. ## What this stands on 1. Scientists tested nuking a city killer asteroid via computer simulation. ([vice.com](https://www.vice.com/en/article/nuking-a-city-killer-asteroid-might-not-be-the-worst-idea-scientists-tested-it/), claim on record) 2. Isaiah Santistevan led the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory team. ([vice.com](https://www.vice.com/en/article/nuking-a-city-killer-asteroid-might-not-be-the-worst-idea-scientists-tested-it/), claim on record) 3. The research was published in The Planetary Science Journal. ([vice.com](https://www.vice.com/en/article/nuking-a-city-killer-asteroid-might-not-be-the-worst-idea-scientists-tested-it/), claim on record) 4. Simulations tested a 1-megaton nuclear blast near a 160-meter asteroid. ([thebrighterside.news](https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/a-1-megaton-nuclear-blast-could-prevent-97-of-a-city-killer-asteroid-from-hitting-earth/), claim on record) 5. Simulations used a one-megaton nuclear weapon near a 525-foot asteroid modeled after Bennu. ([vice.com](https://www.vice.com/en/article/nuking-a-city-killer-asteroid-might-not-be-the-worst-idea-scientists-tested-it/), claim on record) 6. Blast X-rays heat asteroid surface to drive fractures, not shock waves. ([thebrighterside.news](https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/a-1-megaton-nuclear-blast-could-prevent-97-of-a-city-killer-asteroid-from-hitting-earth/), claim on record) 7. Surface material ejection may change asteroid trajectory and fracture the rock. ([vice.com](https://www.vice.com/en/article/nuking-a-city-killer-asteroid-might-not-be-the-worst-idea-scientists-tested-it/), claim on record) 8. Two of three tested simulation scenarios showed strong asteroid disruption signs. ([newswise.com](https://www.newswise.com/articles/llnl-simulations-explore-nuclear-mitigation-of-asteroid-threats), claim on record) 9. At 10-meter detonation distance, 98.2 percent of asteroid material was damaged. ([vice.com](https://www.vice.com/en/article/nuking-a-city-killer-asteroid-might-not-be-the-worst-idea-scientists-tested-it/), claim on record) 10. In one simulation, 97% of asteroid material moved faster than escape velocity. ([thebrighterside.news](https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/a-1-megaton-nuclear-blast-could-prevent-97-of-a-city-killer-asteroid-from-hitting-earth/), claim on record) 11. Moving the bomb further away caused more widespread asteroid damage. ([vice.com](https://www.vice.com/en/article/nuking-a-city-killer-asteroid-might-not-be-the-worst-idea-scientists-tested-it/), claim on record) 12. One 145 millisecond simulation took 59 days to run on 1680 computer processors. ([sciencealert.com](https://www.sciencealert.com/our-survival-might-one-day-rely-on-nuking-a-city-killer-asteroid-scientists-just-tested-whether-itll-work), claim on record) 13. Simulations only ran for fractions of a second. ([thebrighterside.news](https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/a-1-megaton-nuclear-blast-could-prevent-97-of-a-city-killer-asteroid-from-hitting-earth/), claim on record) 14. Researchers cannot confirm if fragments will disperse safely or regroup. ([thebrighterside.news](https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/a-1-megaton-nuclear-blast-could-prevent-97-of-a-city-killer-asteroid-from-hitting-earth/), claim on record) ## Provenance Produced by the automated newsroom line and filed on the DRM3 fact record. Content hash sha256:6b3257a58ec6fcf4170b8e49167a678e3dcc8fbcde32a036f8d940a57e5edc44. Signed receipt cZmMRqutL2C3XYweoXmJ... (Ed25519). Machine-readable proof: https://news.luisafernanda.space/story/bb07efcd3c9f4c5fb026e340a2738def/proof HTML edition: https://news.luisafernanda.space/story/bb07efcd3c9f4c5fb026e340a2738def A signature proves who filed this and that it has not changed since. It never makes a claim true.