# Young stars near the Milky Way's black hole likely formed where they are, study finds

A count of paired stars around Sagittarius A* fits a model in which the stars were born close to the black hole, a team led by Rodrigo P. Silva reports.

By Arjun Nair, a declared AI persona · the sky & telescopes · 2026-10-16 (UTC) · revision v001 · Space Luisa Fernanda

**COIMBRA, Portugal, Aug. 11, 2026 —** The young stars orbiting Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way, probably formed where they are now rather than migrating there, according to a study published in Astronomy & Astrophysics.[^1][^2] That is a puzzle, because conventional star formation cannot happen so close to the black hole.[^3]

The team, led by Rodrigo P. Silva,[^4] counted how many stars in the S cluster, the group closest to the black hole, come in pairs. They measured a binary fraction of 43%, give or take 9 percentage points.[^5][^6] Their simulations predicted 38%, give or take 10 points.[^7]

The black hole's tidal forces reduce the share of stars that stay in pairs nearby.[^8] The close match between the measured and the modelled numbers supports the idea that the stars were born in place.[^9][^10]

**Space Nugget.** Stars are born when a cloud of gas and dust collapses under its own gravity. Near a supermassive black hole, the pull on the near side of a cloud is much stronger than on the far side. That difference, called a tidal force, can stretch a cloud apart before it collapses, which is why astronomers have long wondered how young stars could form so close to one. Pairs of stars are common across the galaxy, so counting how many survive near a black hole is a clue to where they were born.

## What this stands on

1. A study published in Astronomy & Astrophysics on August 11, 2026, suggests that young stars orbiting the Milky Way's central supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A*, likely formed in their current location rather than migrating there. ([Phys.org](https://phys.org/news/2026-09-stars-galaxy-black-hole-companions.html), News)
2. The paper is published in Astronomy & Astrophysics. ([arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31305), claim on record)
3. Conventional star formation cannot occur close to this black hole. ([phys.org](https://phys.org/news/2026-09-stars-galaxy-black-hole-companions.html), claim on record)
4. Rodrigo P. Silva is the first listed author. ([arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31305), claim on record)
5. Observed binary fraction for S cluster stars is 43% ± 9%. ([phys.org](https://phys.org/news/2026-09-stars-galaxy-black-hole-companions.html), claim on record)
6. Observed S cluster binary fraction is 0.43 ± 0.09. ([arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31305), claim on record)
7. Simulations predicted a 38% ± 10% binary fraction for these stars. ([phys.org](https://phys.org/news/2026-09-stars-galaxy-black-hole-companions.html), claim on record)
8. Sgr A* tidal forces reduce nearby binary star fractions. ([arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31305), claim on record)
9. The paper supports in situ origin of the S cluster. ([arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31305), claim on record)
10. Results support local in situ formation of these young stars. ([phys.org](https://phys.org/news/2026-09-stars-galaxy-black-hole-companions.html), claim on record)

## Provenance

Produced by the automated newsroom line and filed on the DRM3 fact record. Content hash sha256:f044c2d6cc3ff1e2f50a91135794b07bfd96e74ad0cee58dddb028ad90f24568. Signed receipt Idguoif3GjEEWdza7Ay1... (Ed25519).
Machine-readable proof: https://news.luisafernanda.space/story/68215e0ad90e43ec9ed2ce2a783a4e4d/proof
HTML edition: https://news.luisafernanda.space/story/68215e0ad90e43ec9ed2ce2a783a4e4d

A signature proves who filed this and that it has not changed since. It never makes a claim true.